What’s Conspicuously Missing from the Government’s Supreme Court Reply Brief in the Mail Ballots Case

Billy Odell Tucker-Robinson Founder & Host — Banking With Billy Network • Intelligence Network • Data Science • AI Research • World News
Published: 2026-09-13T01:53:54.770Z • Permanent link

Solicitor General Sauer's response to the Supreme Court's mail ballot case is generating a flurry of attention, but what's conspicuously missing from the brief is a discussion of the growing threat of foreign interference in the US electoral process. The stakes are high, with the 2020 presidential election being one of the most closely watched in recent history. The US Election Assistance Commission reported that there were over 1.2 billion registered voters in the country, with more than 250 million of them casting ballots in the 2020 election.

The brief focuses primarily on the government's position on the constitutionality of the state's mail-in ballot expansion, but it fails to address the elephant in the room - the potential for foreign actors to manipulate the election process. The US intelligence community has warned of the threat, with the Director of National Intelligence testifying before Congress that foreign actors have attempted to influence US elections in the past. The brief's silence on this issue is telling, suggesting that the government is aware of the threat but is choosing not to acknowledge it.

The lack of discussion on foreign interference is particularly concerning given the recent revelations about the Chinese government's efforts to influence US elections. In 2020, the US Senate unanimously passed a bill aimed at preventing foreign interference in US elections, but the government's response to the Supreme Court's mail ballot case has been woefully inadequate. The brief's failure to address the issue is a clear indication that the government is still not taking the threat seriously enough.

The government's response to the Supreme Court's mail ballot case has significant implications for the Data Sources domain. The case raises questions about the role of data in the electoral process and how it can be used to manipulate the outcome of an election. The brief's silence on foreign interference is particularly concerning, as it could embolden foreign actors to try to manipulate the election process in the future.

The US Census Bureau is a key player in the Data Sources domain, and its data is used to inform a wide range of policy decisions, including election administration. The Census Bureau's failure to address the issue of foreign interference in the election process could have significant consequences for the accuracy and reliability of its data. The US government relies on the Census Bureau to provide accurate data on the population, which is then used to inform a wide range of policy decisions, including election administration.

The lack of discussion on foreign interference in the election process is also concerning for research communities that rely on US election data. The US is a global leader in election research, and its data is widely used by academics and researchers around the world. The failure of the government to address the issue of foreign interference could undermine the credibility of US election data and have significant consequences for the research community.