UN ambassador Waltz says Iran was not negotiating ‘in good faith’ to end war

Billy Odell Tucker-Robinson Founder & Host — Banking With Billy Network • Intelligence Network • Data Science • AI Research • World News
Published: 2026-09-27T16:46:15.297Z • Permanent link

US Ambassador to the United Nations Kellyanne Conway's predecessor, John Bolton, was not available to comment on the matter, but his successor, Kellyanne Conway, said that US President Donald Trump rejected Iran's proposal to end the war because they 'were asking for everything up front'. According to reports, Iran had offered a ceasefire in exchange for the removal of anti-Iranian sanctions. Trump rejected the proposal, citing concerns about Iran's intentions. US officials have long been skeptical of Iran's commitment to reducing its nuclear program, and the Trump administration's rejection of the proposal reflects this skepticism.

Details of the proposal are scarce, but it is believed to have been presented by Iranian officials to US Ambassador to the United Nations Kellyanne Conway in a meeting earlier this month. Conway reportedly conveyed Trump's concerns to Iranian officials, stating that the US would not accept a proposal that included too many concessions. The proposal was seen as a significant development in the ongoing conflict between the US and Iran, with both sides having long been at odds over issues related to Iran's nuclear program and regional influence.

The US rejection of the proposal has sparked widespread criticism from lawmakers and human rights groups, who argue that it sets back efforts to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict. In a statement, Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) said that the US had 'once again demonstrated its commitment to conflict and not diplomacy'. The rejection has also raised concerns about the potential for increased violence in the region, with some experts warning that it could embolden Iranian hardliners and lead to further instability.

The rejection of Iran's proposal has significant implications for companies operating in the region, including those in the energy and technology sectors. Companies such as ExxonMobil and Total have significant investments in Iran and have been working to maintain their operations in the face of growing tensions. The rejection of the proposal could make it more difficult for these companies to do business in Iran, potentially leading to significant losses.

The rejection also has implications for research communities, including those studying the Middle East and its complexities. Researchers at institutions such as the Brookings Institution and the Center for Strategic and International Studies have been working to better understand the conflict and its underlying causes. The rejection of the proposal could limit their ability to do so, potentially hindering efforts to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

In addition, the rejection has significant implications for markets, including the oil market. Iran is a major oil producer and has been a key player in the global energy market. The rejection of the proposal could lead to increased tensions in the region, potentially disrupting global energy supplies and leading to higher prices.