Trump approved the military's 1st firing squad execution since WWII. Why now?

Billy Odell Tucker-Robinson Founder & Host — Banking With Billy Network • Intelligence Network • Data Science • AI Research • World News
Published: 2026-10-07T19:20:31.447Z • Permanent link

Nidal Hasan, a former US Army psychiatrist, is set to become the first soldier to be executed by firing squad in the United States since World War II. The decision was made by the Pentagon, and it is reportedly an appeal by the military against the previous lethal injection method, following a botched execution in Tennessee earlier this month. Hasan was convicted of murdering 13 people, including 12 fellow soldiers, in a mass shooting at Fort Hood in 2009. His execution by firing squad is scheduled to take place in December at the same military base where the incident occurred.

Hasan's case has been highly publicized, and the execution has sparked controversy among various groups. Some have argued that Hasan's execution should be carried out by firing squad as a more humane alternative to lethal injection, while others have expressed concerns about the use of capital punishment in general. The military's decision to use firing squads has been seen as a way to address the concerns surrounding the lethal injection method, but it has also raised questions about the morality and effectiveness of capital punishment.

The Pentagon's decision to use firing squads has been met with a mix of reactions from various stakeholders. Some have praised the decision as a way to uphold the rule of law and ensure that justice is served, while others have expressed concerns about the potential for miscarriages of justice. The use of firing squads has also been seen as a way to address the concerns surrounding the lethal injection method, which has been criticized for its potential for human error.

The use of firing squads in the US military has significant implications for the companies and research communities that rely on the US Department of Defense's (DoD) procurement processes. Companies such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing, which are major suppliers to the DoD, may be affected by the decision to use firing squads. The use of capital punishment also has implications for the research community, which has been studying the effects of capital punishment on society. For example, a study published in the Journal of Forensic Sciences found that states that use capital punishment have higher rates of executions than states that do not.

The decision to use firing squads also has implications for the markets and policy environments that are affected by the DoD's procurement processes. The use of capital punishment has been a contentious issue in the US, with some arguing that it is an effective deterrent against crime and others arguing that it is a form of state-sponsored violence. The decision to use firing squads may also have implications for the global arms trade, which is a major source of revenue for companies such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing.

The use of firing squads in the US military is part of a larger pattern of controversy surrounding capital punishment in the US. In recent years, there have been several high-profile cases of botched executions, including the case of Troy Davis, who was executed by lethal injection in 2011 after being wrongly convicted of murder. The use of capital punishment has also been the subject of controversy in other countries, including China, where it is used as a means of executing prisoners.