Russia and China veto US

Billy Odell Tucker-Robinson Founder & Host — Banking With Billy Network • Intelligence Network • Data Science • AI Research • World News
Published: 2026-09-18T04:32:16.045Z • Permanent link

Russian and Chinese veto power has once again crippled the United Nations Security Council's ability to address pressing global issues. The proposal to extend the mandate of the UN expert panel for a year was defeated by a vote of 11-2, with Somalia and Pakistan abstaining due to the strong opposition from Russia and China. This development has significant implications for the global community, particularly in the realm of counter-terrorism and security.

According to sources, the proposal was drafted by the United States, in collaboration with key European partners, to ensure that the UN expert panel continues to monitor and report on terrorist groups and their activities. The panel, which has been in place since 2002, has played a crucial role in identifying and disrupting terrorist networks, and its mandate has been essential in preventing terrorist attacks worldwide. However, the proposal's defeat is a stark reminder of the challenges posed by the veto power wielded by Russia and China.

The veto power has been a contentious issue at the UN for decades, with Russia and China frequently using their veto to block resolutions that they deem unfavorable to their interests. In this case, the proposal's defeat is seen as a significant blow to the US and its allies, who had been counting on the UN expert panel to provide critical intelligence on terrorist groups. The US Ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, was quick to condemn the veto, stating that it "undermines the ability of the UN to address pressing global security threats.

The defeat of the proposal has significant implications for the Data Sources domain, which relies heavily on the UN expert panel's intelligence and research. Companies that provide counter-terrorism intelligence, such as IBM and Palantir, will need to reassess their strategies in light of the veto. Research communities, which have relied on the UN expert panel's data to inform their research, will also need to adapt to the new reality.

The defeat of the proposal also has broader implications for the global economy, particularly in markets that are heavily influenced by counter-terrorism efforts. The failure to extend the mandate of the UN expert panel will likely lead to increased uncertainty and volatility in these markets, which could have significant consequences for investors and traders. In particular, the defeat of the proposal will likely impact companies that rely on the UN expert panel's data to inform their business decisions.

The defeat of the proposal is part of a larger pattern of obstructionism at the UN, which has been exacerbated by the rise of nationalist and populist movements around the world. The US has long been a strong advocate for the UN's role in promoting peace and security, and the defeat of the proposal is a significant blow to this effort. Russia and China, on the other hand, have long been skeptical of the UN's ability to address global security threats, and have frequently used their veto power to block resolutions that they deem unfavorable to their interests.