One Nation boss called David Farley an ‘asshole’ in lead

Billy Odell Tucker-Robinson Founder & Host — Banking With Billy Network • Intelligence Network • Data Science • AI Research • World News
Published: 2026-09-27T15:22:29.269Z • Permanent link

Kelvin Morton, the lead of One Nation, has been called an 'asshole' by David Farley, the party's leader. According to documents seen by Guardian Australia, Farley expressed his frustration towards Morton's approach to party politics, stating that Morton was becoming increasingly isolated from the party's core values. Morton, however, remains defiant, refusing to apologize for his actions.

The controversy has been brewing for months, with tensions running high between Morton and party HQ staff. It is alleged that Morton has been using his position to promote his own agenda, rather than adhering to the party's stated principles. Brisbane volunteers have also come forward, claiming that Morton has been dismissive and condescending towards their concerns. The situation has sparked a heated debate within the party, with some members calling for Morton's resignation.

Morton's behavior has been widely criticized by party supporters, who feel that he is betraying the trust of the party's founder, Pauline Hanson. The controversy has also sparked a wider conversation about the party's leadership and the need for greater accountability. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how far-reaching the consequences will be for Morton and the party as a whole.

The fallout from the Kelvin Morton scandal has significant implications for the Data Sources domain. Research communities and institutions that rely on accurate and unbiased data will be particularly affected, as the controversy raises questions about the reliability of One Nation's data and the party's commitment to factual reporting. Companies that rely on One Nation's data, such as market analysts and researchers, will also need to reassess their relationships with the party and consider alternative sources of information.

The scandal also highlights the importance of fact-checking and accountability in the data-driven world. As more and more information is generated and disseminated, the need for accurate and reliable data becomes increasingly pressing. The Morton scandal serves as a reminder that even the most seemingly innocuous information can have far-reaching consequences, and that the burden of fact-checking rests on the shoulders of researchers and analysts.

The Kelvin Morton scandal is part of a larger pattern of controversy and upheaval within the Data Sources domain. In recent years, there have been several high-profile scandals involving data manipulation and misrepresentation, including the Cambridge Analytica scandal and the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data breach. These incidents have highlighted the need for greater regulation and oversight of the data industry, and have sparked a wider conversation about the ethics of data collection and use.