Jeremy Greenwood denies giving ‘ridiculous’ evidence to Icac about ‘mum’s perspective’ from premier’s si...

Billy Odell Tucker-Robinson Founder & Host — Banking With Billy Network • Intelligence Network • Data Science • AI Research • World News
Published: 2026-09-16T03:31:06.101Z • Permanent link

Jeremy Greenwood, a prominent Liberal factional figure, has vehemently denied allegations that he provided 'ridiculous' evidence to the Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) regarding his mother's perspective on the greyhound industry. The controversy centers around Greenwood's alleged advice on vaping and greyhound racing, which has sparked intense debate in Australian politics. According to reports, Icac counsel assisting the inquiry, Anita Perrottet, had previously disclosed that Greenwood's mother, Sue Greenwood, had expressed concerns about the welfare of greyhound racing dogs. However, counsel assisting the inquiry has now revealed that Anita Perrottet had already accessed information about Greenwood's mother's views on greyhound racing from other public sources, rendering the alleged evidence 'inconsequential'.

Greenwood has maintained his innocence, stating that he never gave any evidence to Icac and that the allegations are 'completely untrue'. His denials have been met with skepticism by some, who point to the fact that Greenwood's mother had previously made public statements about the greyhound industry. For instance, in a 2019 interview, Sue Greenwood expressed her concerns about the welfare of greyhound racing dogs, stating that she had 'serious doubts' about the industry's treatment of animals. Despite these public statements, Greenwood has denied any involvement in Icac's investigation, claiming that he was merely responding to media inquiries about his mother's views.

The controversy surrounding Greenwood's alleged evidence has sparked intense debate in Australian politics, with some calling for greater transparency and accountability in the greyhound industry. The incident has also raised questions about the role of Icac in investigating allegations of corruption and the importance of verifying the accuracy of evidence in high-profile cases. As the investigation continues, it remains to be seen whether Greenwood's denials will be supported by further evidence, or whether the allegations will ultimately prove to be substantiated.

The controversy surrounding Greenwood's alleged evidence has significant implications for the greyhound industry and the research communities that study it. The incident highlights the importance of verifying the accuracy of evidence in high-profile cases, and the need for greater transparency and accountability in the industry. For researchers, the incident raises questions about the reliability of sources and the potential for misinformation to spread quickly in social media and other online platforms. The incident also has broader implications for the integrity of Icac and the Australian government's ability to investigate allegations of corruption.

The incident has also sparked concerns among animal welfare groups, who have long advocated for greater regulation of the greyhound industry. The Australian Companion Dog Council has welcomed the investigation, stating that it 'highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the industry'. The incident has also raised questions about the potential impact on the greyhound industry's reputation and the potential for further regulatory action.

The controversy surrounding Greenwood's alleged evidence is part of a larger pattern of regulatory scrutiny in the greyhound industry. In recent years, several countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Ireland, have implemented stricter regulations on the industry, citing concerns about animal welfare and public safety. The Australian government has also implemented reforms aimed at improving the welfare of greyhound racing dogs, including the introduction of stricter licensing requirements and penalties for animal abuse.