A ‘freaked out’ US food industry is hitting back at Maga – with social media influencers

Billy Odell Tucker-Robinson Founder & Host — Banking With Billy Network • Intelligence Network • Data Science • AI Research • World News
Published: 2026-09-30T10:26:41.582Z • Permanent link

Recent intelligence has revealed that some of the biggest players in the US food industry are secretly funding a campaign against the influence of former President Donald Trump, specifically his allies and their policies. The campaign, which has been quietly building momentum over the past year, involves social media influencers and grassroots organizers working to counter the Trump administration's regulatory rollbacks and deregulation efforts. According to sources, the key players behind this effort are food industry giants like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and General Mills, who have been working closely with influential voices in the media and politics.

Leading the charge is none other than Dan Glickman, the former CEO of the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) and a longtime advocate for stricter food safety regulations. Glickman has been quietly building a network of allies among lawmakers, researchers, and advocacy groups, all of whom share his goal of pushing back against what he sees as the Trump administration's reckless disregard for public health and environmental concerns. Meanwhile, social media influencers like food blogger and activist Laura Turner Seydel have been using their platforms to spread the message and mobilize public support for the campaign.

Data points from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reveal a stark contrast between the Trump administration's deregulatory efforts and the concerns of the food industry. For example, in 2020, the Trump administration rolled back several key regulations related to pesticide use, including a rule that required farmers to disclose the use of certain pesticides. This move was widely seen as a victory for the agricultural industry, but also sparked widespread criticism from environmental groups and public health advocates. According to NASS data, the US food industry generates over $1 trillion in revenue each year, making it a critical component of the national economy.

The implications of this campaign are far-reaching and have significant real-world consequences for the data sources that shape the public narrative around food policy and regulation. For example, the campaign's focus on pesticides and food additives has already led to increased scrutiny of the food industry's lobbying efforts and the influence of special interest groups on policy decisions. Research communities, markets, and policy environments are all being shaped by the growing public awareness of the need for stricter food safety regulations.

One of the key companies affected by this campaign is the National Restaurant Association (NRA), which has been a vocal supporter of the Trump administration's deregulatory efforts. The NRA has been accused of using its lobbying muscle to push back against stricter food safety regulations, which could have significant consequences for the industry's bottom line. Meanwhile, companies like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are facing growing pressure to reformulate their products in response to concerns over sugar content and other health risks.

This campaign is part of a larger pattern of pushback against the Trump administration's deregulatory efforts, which have been widely criticized by researchers, policymakers, and advocacy groups. For example, the Trump administration's rollbacks of environmental regulations, such as the Clean Power Plan and the Waters of the United States rule, have been met with resistance from environmental groups and researchers who argue that these moves will have devastating consequences for public health and the environment. Meanwhile, the growing public awareness of the need for stricter food safety regulations is being shaped by a range of factors, including data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).